Performing science: From a research project to communicating resulsts
|Kod przedmiotu:||WFz.DCogNeS-07||Kod Erasmus / ISCED:||(brak danych) / (brak danych)|
|Nazwa przedmiotu:||Performing science: From a research project to communicating resulsts|
|Punkty ECTS i inne:||
zobacz reguły punktacji
The topics covered in class* 1. Rules of communication and information absorption
2. Using scientific literature data bases and constructing effective library queries
3. Preparing research grant proposal
4. Writing a scientific paper
5. Reviewing and evaluating research manuscripts
Supplementary material provided at the course website
Glasman-Deal, H. (2010) Science research writing for non-native speakers of English. London Imperial College Press, 257 pp.
Day, R. A. & Gastel, B. (2006) How to write and publish a scientific paper. Greenwood, 320 pp.
Katz, M. J. (2009) From research to manuscript: a guide to scientific writing. Springer, 210 pp.
Peat, J., Elliott, E., Baur, L. & Keena, V. (2002). Scientific writing: easy when you know how. Wiley-Blackwell, 312 pp.
|Efekty uczenia się:||
Learning outcomes for the class: knowledge, skills and social competences Knowledge:
Student knows how to:
• search for scientific information, evaluate sources, select and integrate information;
• prepare good research project;
• effectively communicate scientific information to the community, using appropriate platforms;
• participate actively in scientific discussions.
• evaluate scientific quality of others’ research;
• write a review of a scientific paper;
Student is able to:
• prepare and submit a research project to a granting body
• communicate his/her research to scientific community as oral presentations, posters, and research and review papers; prepare a review of a scientific paper;
• participate actively in the peer review system: can assess the quality of research and a manuscript or grant proposal, can communicate his opinion in a polite and constructive manner;
• communicate science to public through popular lectures and articles, active participation in public discussions, and consultancy.
• student understands that science is based on full honesty and transparency, hence when doing research and communicating its results, all details have to be specified in a way that is clear and detailed enough to let others repeat exactly the same study;
• student is ready to accept comments, including criticism, in a constructive way, and understands that this is the best tool to improve his/her scholarly work;
• student understands the need to share his/her research results with general public and the role of this process in the educational and financing systems
• student understands and accepts that an important part of scientific approach is dissemination of her/his research results and exposition of them to falsification tests;
• student perceives other scientists as partners in discussion, even if they represent different fields of science;
• student understands that even strong criticism should be always expressed in a polite and constructive manner.
|Metody i kryteria oceniania:||
50% of the maximum score for grant proposal, oral presentation and the review, combined
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie.