Performing science: From a research project to communicating resulsts
Informacje ogólne
Kod przedmiotu: | WFz.DCogNeS-07 | Kod Erasmus / ISCED: | (brak danych) / (brak danych) |
Nazwa przedmiotu: | Performing science: From a research project to communicating resulsts | ||
Jednostka: | Instytut Psychologii | ||
Grupy: | |||
Punkty ECTS i inne: |
(brak)
![]() ![]() |
||
Język prowadzenia: | angielski | ||
Skrócony opis: |
The topics covered in class* 1. Rules of communication and information absorption 2. Using scientific literature data bases and constructing effective library queries 3. Preparing research grant proposal 4. Writing a scientific paper 5. Reviewing and evaluating research manuscripts |
||
Literatura: |
Obligatory reading: Supplementary material provided at the course website Recommended reading: Glasman-Deal, H. (2010) Science research writing for non-native speakers of English. London Imperial College Press, 257 pp. Day, R. A. & Gastel, B. (2006) How to write and publish a scientific paper. Greenwood, 320 pp. Katz, M. J. (2009) From research to manuscript: a guide to scientific writing. Springer, 210 pp. Peat, J., Elliott, E., Baur, L. & Keena, V. (2002). Scientific writing: easy when you know how. Wiley-Blackwell, 312 pp. |
||
Efekty uczenia się: |
Learning outcomes for the class: knowledge, skills and social competences Knowledge: Student knows how to: • search for scientific information, evaluate sources, select and integrate information; • prepare good research project; • effectively communicate scientific information to the community, using appropriate platforms; • participate actively in scientific discussions. • evaluate scientific quality of others’ research; • write a review of a scientific paper; Skills: Student is able to: • prepare and submit a research project to a granting body • communicate his/her research to scientific community as oral presentations, posters, and research and review papers; prepare a review of a scientific paper; • participate actively in the peer review system: can assess the quality of research and a manuscript or grant proposal, can communicate his opinion in a polite and constructive manner; • communicate science to public through popular lectures and articles, active participation in public discussions, and consultancy. Social competence: • student understands that science is based on full honesty and transparency, hence when doing research and communicating its results, all details have to be specified in a way that is clear and detailed enough to let others repeat exactly the same study; • student is ready to accept comments, including criticism, in a constructive way, and understands that this is the best tool to improve his/her scholarly work; • student understands the need to share his/her research results with general public and the role of this process in the educational and financing systems • student understands and accepts that an important part of scientific approach is dissemination of her/his research results and exposition of them to falsification tests; • student perceives other scientists as partners in discussion, even if they represent different fields of science; • student understands that even strong criticism should be always expressed in a polite and constructive manner. |
||
Metody i kryteria oceniania: |
50% of the maximum score for grant proposal, oral presentation and the review, combined |
| |||||
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie.