Drukuj sylabusDo maps lie?
Informacje ogólne
| Kod przedmiotu: | WG.IG-2217-D |
| Kod Erasmus / ISCED: |
(brak danych)
/
(0613) Tworzenie i analiza oprogramowania i aplikacji
|
| Nazwa przedmiotu: | Do maps lie? |
| Jednostka: | Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej |
| Grupy: |
E-gospodarka przestrzenna, kurs po angielsku |
| Punkty ECTS i inne: |
2.00
|
| Język prowadzenia: | angielski |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr letni 2023/2024" (w trakcie)
| Okres: | 2024-02-26 - 2024-06-16 |
 
PN WT CW
ŚR CZ PT |
| Typ zajęć: |
Ćwiczenia, 15 godzin
|
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Małgorzata Luc | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Małgorzata Luc | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: | Przedmiot - Zaliczenie na ocenę | |
| Efekty kształcenia: | KNOWLEDGE - general concept of visualization and cartography methods (Geogr_II: KW_03) - knowledge of consequences of using varied methods of presentation as well as data manipulation (Geogr_II: KW_06, KW_08) ABILITIES - of using right nomenclature within visualization and cartography methodology (Geogr_II: KU_01, KU_02) - of writing in English a report of a chosen scientific problem in visualization and cartography methods problematic (KU_08) PERSONAL AND SOCIAL COMPETENCES - is conscience of a need of increasing his competencies as well as an individual work (KKS_01) - is responsible for computer equipment, safety of his work as well as the others (KKS_03) - is conscience of author rights (KKS_05) |
|
| Wymagania wstępne: | Geoinformatyka; or another basic GIS course |
|
| Forma i warunki zaliczenia: | Student during the computer laboratory work is under a constant control. He applies theoretical knowledge and moderates discussion. Written and graphical work is examined according to the right cartographic methods of presentation as well as creativity. Credit is going to be received under the condition of a correct completeness of 3 exercises including a report. |
|
| Metody sprawdzania i kryteria oceny efektów kształcenia uzyskanych przez studentów: | Student during the computer laboratory work is under a constant control. He applies theoretical knowledge and moderates discussion. Written and graphical work is examined according to the right cartographic methods of presentation as well as creativity. |
|
| Metody dydaktyczne: | Metody podające – informative lecture Metody praktyczne – computer laboratory work Metody praktyczne – project work (including report writing) Metody problemowe – stimulating methods - discussion Metody problemowe – problem solving lectures Metody programowane – computer work |
|
| Bilans punktów ECTS: | - contact hours with lecturer: 15h - individual preparations for computer work (reminding of ArcGIS software): 10h - literature reading: 10h - report writing: 5h - preparing the final practical work: 20h SUM: 60h of student’s work |
|
| Sylabus przedmiotu dla studentów rozpoczynających studia od roku akademickiego 19/20 lub później: | Geografia, studia stacjonarne drugiego stopnia, rok 1 |
|
| Pełny opis: |
1. Map as a model of reality – little white lies, attraction and distraction • colours (features, associations, optical illusions, colour versus grey schemes and scale) • symbols (changing geometry of symbols –what does it change, impact of signature types on information perception, power of an arrow) • generalisation (of inscriptions, abbreviations, generalisation stages, changes of projections – units and geometric forms, MMU, reclassification, relativism-an example of city centre and city outskirt communication scheme) • date of data acquisition and date of printing – problem of manipulation. Exerscise 1: • comparison of data from orthophotomap with data from other maps • creation of a few images of the same area but in varied scales, map projections, different generalization methods, with the use of contrasting colours and/or symbols • Discussion over results. 2. Does a map deform a real world? • What impact does a scale change has on an information perception? • World projections (distortions), • Should a map be north or south orienting? What is a difference? • 2D or 3D – that is a question, • Aerial photographs and orthophotomaps as a real world pictures versus model • Manual and digital maps – possibilities, dangers (tools that help creating maps, digitalization mistakes or faults – a comparison based on aerial surface measurement). Continuation of exercise 1. 3. Relativism in data presentation • Types of maps • Subjective presentation of relative data: cartograms (use of veriables: time, cost, distance, power of statistics, relative and nonrelative data), cartodiagrams • Chorochromatic maps • Isoplet maps Excercise 2: presentation of the same data but with the use of various methods – discussion of results 4. Map as a conscience way of psychological manipulation • Political reasons (propaganda), ideological (religious), economical (greed), content-related (incompetence, carelessness) • Is cartography a science or an art? – types of cartography, many ways of presenting the same reality • Mental map Excercise 3: mental map versus a map for special purposes 5. Development maps - subjectivity or manipulation • Plans od spatial development. • City visualisation (eg. developer’s advertisement) • 11 rules of polishing the cartographic image (be selective, frame strategically, accentuate the positive, if caught have a story ready – ideological manipulation, minimize the negative, dazzle with detail, camouflage embarrassing details, distract with aerial photos and historical maps, generalize creatively, enchant with elegance, When all else fails, try bribery). Continuation of exercise 3. |
|
| Literatura: |
Basic literature: Longley P.A., Goodchild M.F., Maguire D.J., Rhind D.W., 2006, GIS. Theory and practice. |
|
| Uwagi: |
Kurs do wyboru wyłącznie dla studentów studiów magisterskich na kierunku geografia |
|
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie.
