COMPERATIVE POLITICS- Wykład ogłoszony jako kierunkowy - III rok
Informacje ogólne
| Kod przedmiotu: | WSM.INP-DOK-035-20 | Kod Erasmus / ISCED: | (brak danych) / (brak danych) |
| Nazwa przedmiotu: | COMPERATIVE POLITICS- Wykład ogłoszony jako kierunkowy - III rok | ||
| Jednostka: | Instytut Nauk Politycznych i Stosunków Międzynarodowych | ||
| Grupy: |
Zajęcia obligatoryjne dla III roku- studia doktoranckie - INP |
||
| Punkty ECTS i inne: |
3.00   zobacz reguły punktacji |
||
| Język prowadzenia: | angielski | ||
Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr letni 2020/2021" (w trakcie)
| Okres: | 2021-02-25 - 2021-06-15 |
 
 zobacz plan zajęć |
| Typ zajęć: |
Wykład, 30 godzin więcej informacji |
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Łukasz Jakubiak, Beata Kosowska-Gąstoł, Tomasz Wieciech | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Łukasz Jakubiak, Beata Kosowska-Gąstoł, Tomasz Wieciech | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: | Egzamin | |
| Cele kształcenia: | The course focuses on structures, institutions, actors and processes influencing the decision-making in modern political systems. The aim of the course is to provide the analytical knowledge in order to understand comparative politics. During the course the most important terms and concepts will be discussed, the theoretical framework will be illustrated with examples from worldwide politics. |
|
| Efekty kształcenia: | Knowledge - graduate of the course: • understands what Comparative Politics is • knows paradigms and research methods typical of Comparative Politics • knows the basic features of democratic and authoritarian regimes and understands the threats of modern democracies • knows the structures, institutions and political actors involved in the creation of state policy • understands the political processes taking place in modern political systems Skills - graduate of the course: • can identify institutions and actors involved in the political decision-making process • can use the knowledge of Compartive Politics to identify the problems of modern countries and discuss how to solve them • can make a critical analysis of existing research and literature in the field of Comparative Politics • is able to participate in scientific discourse in the field of Comparative Politics, formulate their own views, cite adequate arguments Competences - graduate of the course: • is ready to analyze scientific achievements critically and to undertake scientific polemics • is ready to recognize the importance of knowledge in the field of functioning of democratic regimes (based on free elections, representation and participation as well as the freedom of the political parties’ action) in solving the problems of modern democracies |
|
| Forma i warunki zaliczenia: | Participants are obliged to attend classes and to keep up with the required readings, to take part in discussions and to argue their stances (evaluated after each class) (60 %) and to prepare an oral presentation (40%). |
|
| Metody sprawdzania i kryteria oceny efektów kształcenia uzyskanych przez studentów: | • continuous assessment based on active participation in classes, taking part in discussions, knowing of the subject literature, • preparation and presentation of an oral presentation on a topic agreed with the person offering the classes (during the evaluation of the presentation it will be taken into account: the ability to acquire and analyse information, the usage of the acquired knowledge, as well as the ability to formulate opinions). |
|
| Metody dydaktyczne: | Text analysis, lecture with multimedia presentation, solving tasks, discussion, case study, conversation lecture |
|
| Bilans punktów ECTS: | Work with a teacher: Discussions in classes: 30 h Students' work: Conducting literature studies: 50 h Preparation of the oral presentation: 10 h Total: 90 h – 3 ECTS |
|
| Grupa treści kształcenia: | Grupa treści kierunkowych |
|
| Skrócony opis: |
1) What is comparative politics? Concept, approaches and methods; Modern constitutions 2) Democracies, authoritarian regimes and democratic backsliding 3) Parliamentarism and presidentialism, constitutional frameworks and political practice 4) Elections and referendums 5) Social cleavages 6) Political parties, their models and functions in contemporary political systems 7) Party systems – concept, typologies and dynamics 8) Public policies, conceptual models of policy making, institutions and frames 9) Europeanization and globalization and their impact on domestic politics 10) Federal versus unitary states, trends towards decentralization and regionalization 11) Political representation and participation 12) Interest groups and social movement 13) Veto players, decision making in political systems 14) Legislatures and judicial power 15) Presidents and Governments | |
| Literatura: |
Obligatory readings: • D. Caramani (ed.) (2017), Comparative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Additional readings: • Bardi L., Mair P. (2008), The Parameters of Party Systems, “Party Politics” 14 (2). • Bermeo N. (2016), On Democratic Backsliding, “Journal of Democracy” 27 (1). • Gagnon A.G., Keil S., Mueller S. (eds) (2015), Understanding federalism and federation, Fraham, Burlington: Ashgate. • Gunther R., Montero J.R., Linz J.J. (eds) (2002), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Krouwel A., Party models (2006), [w:] R.S. Katz, W. Crotty (eds), Handbook of Party Politics, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage: 249-269. • Lane K., Malami M. (1999), Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis, “Social Forces” 78(1). • Lijphart A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy, New Haven: Yale. • Mainwaring S. (1993), Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy – the difficult combination, “Comparative Political Studies’ 26 (2). • Porta dell D. et al. (2017), Movement parties against austerity, Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press • Saunders Ch. (1995), Constitutional Arrangements of Federal Systems, “Publius: The Journal of Federalism”, (25) 2. • Stepan A., Skach C. (1993), Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarism and presidentialism, “World Politics” 46 (1). • Tsebelis G. (1995). Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism, “ British Journal of Political Science” 25 (3). | |
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie.